January 3, 2025
The Importance of Having the Right Rate A laboratory incubation with University of Arkansas in 2020 demonstrated that 1,500 parts per million (ppm) DC
Growers have a lot of choices when it comes to choosing an inhibitor. It’s important to avoid quick fixes and “too good to be true” solutions.
This includes buying into dual inhibitor products that promote effective above and below ground protection when the parts per million (ppm) of active ingredients are not agronomically effective. While some stabilizers may claim to deliver the same results, the reality is low-rate products are not the same as products with higher active ingredient concentrations.
Headline here
This is a subline
Paragraph here
There we go
The Importance of Having the Right Rate
A common misconception in the market is that imitator products are "just as good as" name brand products like SUPERU™ fertilizer and ANVOL™ and CENTURO ™ nitrogen stabilizer. The percentage of active ingredients in these other products may not be high enough to be agronomically effective. To get value and results from your stabilizer, you need to choose an option with a higher active rate.
A laboratory incubation with University of Arkansas in 2020 demonstrated that 1,500 parts per million (ppm) DCD on urea was not significantly different than untreated urea at inhibiting nitrification activity over a 10-day period.1 This means growers using low-rate dual inhibitors are not effectively preventing nitrogen conversion, which results in loss from leaching and denitrification. With a variety of products on the market claiming to have dual protection, selecting a solution with the right formulation is a critical step to ensuring your nitrogen is protected from loss.
The Importance of Having the Right Rate A laboratory incubation with University of Arkansas in 2020 demonstrated that 1,500 parts per million (ppm) DCD on urea was not significantly different than untreated urea at inhibiting nitrification activity over a 10-day period.1 This means growers using low-rate dual inhibitors are not effectively preventing nitrogen conversion, which results in loss from leaching and denitrification.
The Importance of Having the Right Rate A laboratory incubation with University of Arkansas in 2020 demonstrated that 1,500 parts per million (ppm) DCD on urea was not significantly different than untreated urea at inhibiting nitrification activity over a 10-day period.1 This means growers using low-rate dual inhibitors are not effectively preventing nitrogen conversion, which results in loss from leaching and denitrification.
Choose Proven Protection Over Empty
Promises Don’t put your trust in low-rate formulations to protect your investment. Connect with a KAS representative today to learn more about how you can stabilize your nitrogen with our proven solutions that protect your nitrogen and your bottom line.
A laboratory incubation with University of Arkansas in 2020 demonstrated that 1,500 parts per million (ppm) DCD on urea was not significantly different than untreated urea at inhibiting nitrification activity over a 10-day period.1 This means growers using low-rate dual inhibitors are not effectively preventing nitrogen conversion, which results in loss from leaching and denitrification.
A laboratory incubation with University of Arkansas in 2020 demonstrated that 1,500 parts per million (ppm) DCD on urea was not significantly different than untreated urea at inhibiting nitrification activity over a 10-day period.1 This means growers using low-rate dual inhibitors are not effectively preventing nitrogen conversion, which results in loss from leaching and denitrification.
The Importance of Having the Right Rate A laboratory incubation with University of Arkansas in 2020 demonstrated that 1,500 parts per million (ppm) DCD on urea was not significantly different than untreated urea at inhibiting nitrification activity over a 10-day period.1 This means growers using low-rate dual inhibitors are not effectively preventing nitrogen conversion, which results in loss from leaching and denitrification.
